No One Shows a Child the Sky

We really ought to listen to our children more than we generally do. They have much they could teach us if only we would let them. The best teacher in creation cannot impart anything to someone who will not assume the role of their student. While it is commonplace for adult teachers to complain that they spend the majority of their time managing the few class members who refuse to comport themselves as students toward them, we are less prepared to hear children complain that most adults do not listen to them. Nonetheless, children know and see a lot to which through socialization adults have become inattentive, even blinded.

I grew up when the freedom movements were becoming more noticeable and vocal, a time when governments began actively intervening to insure equality under the law. My parents made a lot of mistakes rearing me, but they taught me that (absent a person’s being of ill intent) skin colour and nationality and religious differences ought not matter. It took me a long time to become aware that there’s more to it than that; that I had miles to go before I sleep. You know who taught me that? My son.

When he comes home from school (he’s in university now, but we’ve always done this) my son and I sit down and he tells me about his day. When he was in the fourth grade he came home excited to tell me that he’d made a new friend. He talks about why he likes him, how they met, what they do together. My son is a Jew and his friend was Muslim, both of them attending a Catholic school. Day after day he told me more and more about school and his friend. He said he wanted me to meet his friend. When the invitations came for the annual school Bar-B-Q that we always attended he was especially happy because his friend would be there and we could meet. And that we did.

His friend was a handsome little boy, bright eyed and friendly albeit a little shy. Everything my son had told me about his friend was true. There was however one truth about his friend my son neglected to mention. His friend was about as black as a person can possibly be. So black the sun made purple highlights on his skin. The kind of black it’s often difficult to capture in a photograph. In that moment I realized my son knew more than I did up until that moment. I’m no racist; far from it. But had it been me doing the describing, I’d have mentioned colour. I’d have probably mentioned it first. Not to criticize or demean at all; I would mention it because I guess I believed it was salient. Relevant. An important identifying characteristic. Later on that evening I asked my son why he had not mentioned that his friend was of colour. He told me he didn’t see that as important. What he had told me was the important stuff. Years have passed, and my son has learned that colour is important because people of colour too often are oppressed because of it. And when a person allows people to be different without being wrong cultural differences become interesting. But he still doesn’t see colour as an important enough factor in friendship to merit immediate mention or attention. From him I have learned to not let it occupy my mind so much as once it did. A boy in the fourth grade teaching his PhD. father an important lesson in life. No one had to show him that. All I had to do was fail to teach him otherwise. As the song goes “You’ve got to be carefully taught” to hate and to fear. And I never taught him that. And he returned the benefit of that to me in an important teaching.

A person can tell when a phenomenon is spiritual rather than material or physical. Spiritual phenomena have characteristics they do not share with material/physical phenomena. I was able to give my son the kind of an upbringing I myself did not have. Had it been physical, I couldn’t have done that. To give him a rock I’d have to have a rock to give. I would then have one less rock, and he would have one more. A zero-sum game. That’s physical. But I had no such childhood as I gave him. Yet I am able to give it to my son, and I am elevated and increased in the process.

No one shows a child the sky. Kids know stuff. One does well to listen to them.

"Do Your Own Research"? Think Again.

I admit to being sensitive about this topic. I have spent 10 years in post-secondary schools. I am trained to do research. I have published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Yet we were no more than a couple of weeks into this pandemic when someone who ought to have known better…Someone who specializes in occupational health and safety (emphasis mine) accusingly characterized me as an academic (as if that were a bad trait) and in a disparaging tone asked “Why Don’t You Do Your Own Research?

Flashback: When I was a student money was more than a little tight. Trying to keep my old vehicle running I purchased a couple of basic tools. (The mechanics among you: You know just where this is going, don’t you?) Mechanical objects are not puzzled by pretense: What I did didn’t work and I’d have to take it to a mechanic. In frustration one of them told me one day “If you keep trying to do it yourself I’m going to charge you extra for clearing out the mess you make of it.” I couldn’t blame him, and lesson learned. He had spent his life learning how to, and doing mechanical work. Light bulb moment: Purchasing a tool kit does not a mechanic make. I’m the monkey at the typewriter expecting Shakespeare to result from my banging at the keys.

Do your own research. As if purchasing a computer and having an ISP and a search engine makes one capable of researching. I assure you there is more to it than that. To those who claim to have done their own research:

  1. Did you perform a thoroughgoing review of at least a major chunk of all publications available across the history of the issue in question?

  2. Did you write abstracts on all these articles?

  3. Did you take a random sample of all or most of the articles published recently (like over the past 5 years or so) and review them in detail whether or not you liked the conclusions they drew?

  4. Did you examine the sources of funding behind the research itself, or the ownership of the publication in which you found the article printed? Did you check for potential bias on the part of the owners or funding agencies?

  5. Did you study and gain some mastery of the principles and practices of scientific research design? Do you understand how to evaluate the mechanics of a research project, whether it is quantitative or qualitative?

  6. Did you master the statistical techniques used in processing and interpreting the data reported in the articles? Do you understand probability theory? Do you get that it is not uncommon that people use statistics to mislead and obscure rather than to illuminate?

  7. Are you capable of evaluating and identifying the limitations inherent in the analytic methodology and/or the data itself? Did you examine the articles for logical errors?

  8. Did you look into the researcher(s) and their employer(s) biographical information, checking for any patterns or biases that might have them viewing the data more subjectively than is apt for scientific work?

  9. Did you look at the references cited and evaluate them in the same way you do the articles and authors that cite them?

If you did not, then whatever it is you did is not research. You engaged in a process that relied on search algorithms provided by agencies such as Google or Microsoft, agencies you either know are biased or you are too blind to even begin to do research. You wound up with a list of titles and you selected the ones that seemed most agreeable to you. You reached the same conclusions you started out with because you discounted anything that provided evidence to the contrary. You fell into a morass of expectations and confirmation biases and did nothing to maintain your objectivity or dis-enable your subconscious predilections and you reached a personalized set of conclusions that you view as if they had scientific validity. I assure you that they don’t.

Owning a socket set doesn’t make one a mechanic. Surfing the internet doesn’t make you a researcher.

If doing the tasks inherent in research seems daunting or for any other reason seems out of your reach, do not despair. There’s a reasonable substitute: Go to the websites controlled by agencies that are widely-recognized as having expertise and as doing high quality work…Agencies that have a stellar reputation. The World Health Organization. The Mayo Clinics. The national medical association, American or otherwise. Read sources like that, and rely upon what they say.

Remember that Science is developmental. If the answer today is different from yesterday’s it doesn’t mean anybody lied. It means someone demonstrated something that triggered a re-evaluation. Actually, if the answer remains the same year after year, there’s probably not a lot of scientific-quality research happening.

Proselytizing vs. Photo Bombing: A thoughtful Comparison

I don’t do it a lot, but I kind of appreciate photo bombing. Maybe it’s because I am not a big fan of posed pictures of social functions. They seem more than vaguely dishonest to me. Everyone all dressed to the nines in their best bib and tucker. Smiling the camera cheese smiles. Having some yahoo in a pair of flowered shorts and flip flops leering where none of the posers can see I think adds merit to the photo. It leaves a blatant “what’s wrong with this picture” kind of a tone. “One of these things does not belong. Point to the thing that is out of place.” And you point at the photo bomber, right? No harm there. Just good clean fun.

Passover begins at sundown on Nisan 14, which was Tuesday April 7 this year. My son and I prepared a special festive meal together and did the part of the Seder service that can be done by a family of two while in quarantine. We’re not all that Jewish; that is, we’re not hugely observant. Passover is important though. Passover is about freedom from bondage. Passover is about the love of the godhead. So, we did our best. I also posted a brief notation on Facebook that we were observing Pesach and wished everybody freedom and health.

Most of my friends aren’t Jewish. They know I am, I know they’re not; everything is everything. It’s all good. But there’s always that one, right? Well, maybe not always, but it’s no surprise when one appears. One of my (now ex-) friends shares a post that is so frighteningly ignorant and dangerous that it is impossible to view as humorous; at least, for me it is. Atop a photo of a large, singing, dancing, densely packed congregation is emblazoned “COVID-19 WILL STOP AND VANISH IN THE NAME OF JESUS!!!” Right. Sure it will. That worked so very well with the black plague. Yeah. Crowding together in cramped spaces and making loud noises with our mouths has always cured disease. Scares microbes to death, it does. Hurts their little ears.

See, I don’t think it is a coincidence this happened at Pesach. It was the religious equivalent of a photo bomb. However, the bomber's message isn’t “I’m the wrong thing in this picture.” Not at all. The message is “You are in the wrong picture and you need to get out of it or you’re doomed.” As a result, it’s not funny. The bomber is no longer the object that doesn’t fit. The message is the people being bombed are that object. It’s not a joke, it’s an accusation. And it’s dead serious.

Part of the Seder ceremony (and Seder means re-telling) is the statement “In every generation they have risen up to destroy us…” Or, words to that effect. It’s the truth. It predates Christianity by millennia. So, it ain’t funny at all. Not to us. And if everyone can’t laugh at it, it’s not funny.

I understand that many Christians make Jewish people wrong for being Jewish. They see converting to Christianity as the only solution for a Jewish person who does not want to go to hell. They see proselytizing as an emergency, life-saving service, and accepting Jesus as ones personal saviour as being the only path to salvation. They do not see that it’s simply not Jewish to think in those terms. Salvation and original sin are not at all Jewish concepts. The very idea that g_d would attach to an infant the wrongdoing of another would be an insult to the one whose major characteristics are justice and mercy. The Jewish belief is that all a person who seeks g_d's forgiveness needs do is to atone. For example, on Yom Kippur, the (ahem) day of atonement. (Do ya think?) The idea that someone who has not gone astray can atone for someone else who has...Well, no offense, but to a Jewish person, that's nonsensical. In addition, hell as a place of eternal damnation is completely inconsistent with Jewish thought. I’ve heard it said that Jewish hell is more like a spiritual washing machine, a way to clean up before moving on. So the problem is that proselytizing Christian people and Jewish people use the same words, but define them so differently they are essentially speaking different languages. And more important than all of this is that many proselytizers don’t seem to recognize that there is a time and a place. In this particular case, maybe the place is not Facebook, and maybe the time isn't prior to learning a bit about whatever it is that the plan is to convince other people to turn away from. Maybe it's after.

Were Judaism a proselytizing religion (which, thankfully, it is not) I like to think we wouldn’t pick Christmas or Easter as times to make Christians wrong.

BTW, Happy Easter. Enjoy!

A Place for Free Thinking and Expression

Found here are materials that aren’t particularly psychological or clinical in nature. I am including it because I do enjoy thinking and writing about a wide variety of topics. I enjoy story telling. I recently found myself writing a political/social opinion piece that took the form of a letter. I liked it enough to want to share it. I started thinking about finding a web service that would allow me to post blogs. Then I thought about this website and decided to add this page.

This is definitely the website of a person who operates a psychology clinic. During my long career, I’ve had numerous episodes of legal embroilment with my professional association. We have many differences of opinion. One such difference has to do with the meaning of these differences. Now clearly I can only give you my perspective. In my view, the fact that I differ from my professional body doesn’t need to mean anyone is wrong. In my view, they seem to think that where we differ, they are right and I am wrong and I need to see it their way. In the legal processes that stem from this difference of opinion about what our differences of opinion mean, I have generally prevailed.

The problem with legally addressing issues is that the legal process can only handle one at a time. There is a difference which has never been legally addressed. It is this: An overarching assumption seemingly made by my association is that if I am to be a psychologist, if I am to hold out services for hire as a psychologist, I must be a psychologist all the time and that is all I am allowed to be. From my perspective, that is one of the most grandiose delusions of control I have ever heard articulated anywhere. It’s stunning, actually. My view is that a psychologist is indeed one of the ways I manifest in the world, but it is certainly not the only one. I am entitled to manifest myself in the world in other ways, and I do. I am a musician. I am a singer/songwriter. I am a competitive ballroom dancer. I am a novelist. I like to write. I don’t seek trouble with my professional association. I am not going to try to avoid it by shutting down all that I am save being a psychologist.

I considered creating a different website for the material I plan to place here. But why? If I make it clear, and this is me doing that now, that this material is not particularly psychological in nature other than the fact that I wrote all of it, I’m pretty certain a reasonable person will not become confused about what I post. If you want from me only psychological stuff, stop reading this page right now, navigate to a different page and don’t come back. If you’re interested in reading just for the sake of reading it, or you find it of interest, feel free.

FAIR WARNING: What gets posted here may not meet your expectations, or be politically correct, or polite, or particularly astute. It may not be anything I continue to believe after I’ve written it. It will be my own, an honest reflection of what I was thinking when I wrote it. All of it will be something I thought at least once.

I do hope you enjoy reading as much as I do writing. If you do, check back for more.

The moving finger, having written, moves on…